AG Genetics and Breeding
|
Subject: Why 865 Mettler
|
|
From
|
Location
|
Message
|
Date Posted
|
Andy H |
Brooklyn Corner, Nova Scotia
|
Does anyone know why Bill Bobier chose the 865 Mettler as a pollinator for the 935 Lloyd, not once but twice. It certainly proved to be the right choice but why the 865 instead of a more prominent seed during that time. Any and all replies appreciated, thanks.
|
12/7/2008 6:02:26 PM
|
cojoe |
Colorado
|
the 865 mettler was a promising seed back then.lincoln mettler had nice pumpklns on both parent plants.The 865 ended up being a better pollinator.I never grew it but I heard a lot of 865's wouldnt set fruit.
|
12/7/2008 7:18:05 PM
|
Andy W |
Western NY
|
it was just coincidence that he used it the second time, as the 723 hadn't been known to be a proven seed at the time of pollination of the 845. He grew the 865 a second time because it had grown an amazing pumpkin (987, i think) for him the first time. The 865 was actually a better producer for him those two years than the 935 Lloyd was.
He even remade that same cross 2 other times (714 and 838) after that was shown to be a great cross.
|
12/7/2008 7:36:55 PM
|
Andy H |
Brooklyn Corner, Nova Scotia
|
Thanks Andy
|
12/7/2008 9:11:08 PM
|
Andy H |
Brooklyn Corner, Nova Scotia
|
And cojoe
|
12/7/2008 9:21:12 PM
|
Andy W |
Western NY
|
And as someone who has probably grown the 865 more than anyone (6 times over the last 8 years), I would say that I would consider it a top seed on its own, without even considering its contribution as a pollinator.
|
12/8/2008 12:58:44 PM
|
Total Posts: 6 |
Current Server Time: 4/22/2025 6:18:23 AM |